Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 |
1. CCP, Let us moderate our own forum threads. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
ShahFluffers wrote: Nooma K'Larr wrote: There is a difference between taking criticism and taking insults. Poh-tay-toe... poh-tah-toe... Thanks for adding nothing to the thread. Vimsy Vortis wrote: Someone made a post contradict...
- by Nooma K'Larr - at 2012.01.31 06:36:00
|
2. CCP, Let us moderate our own forum threads. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
ShahFluffers wrote: "Civil" discourse comes to people who can take criticism... regardless of the form it takes... There is a difference between taking criticism and taking insults.
- by Nooma K'Larr - at 2012.01.31 05:39:00
|
3. CCP, Let us moderate our own forum threads. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
LeHarfang wrote: It's already in the rules that insults and disrespectful comments arent allowed. There just is'nt enough mods active in here. Especially on weekends. The problem is people will hide behind -I was just stating my opinion- ...
- by Nooma K'Larr - at 2012.01.31 05:23:00
|
4. CCP, Let us moderate our own forum threads. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Andski wrote: it leads to more dumb threads like this one no thanks! But imagine being able to delete "dumb" replies like yours which added nothing to the topic nor explained how. BTW, who made you lord and master of EVE forum topics by de...
- by Nooma K'Larr - at 2012.01.31 05:13:00
|
5. CCP, Let us moderate our own forum threads. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Corina Jarr wrote: Let me explain exactly what would happen. Person A makes a ridiculously stupid thread in GD about something (lets say removing all of Concord and making a button that anyone can press to eject someone from a station). Pers...
- by Nooma K'Larr - at 2012.01.31 05:04:00
|
6. CCP, Let us moderate our own forum threads. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Serge Bastana wrote: Op is just upset about posts made in response to hers on other threads. The sense of entitlement is stifling. Thanks for proving my point. More off topic banter please.
- by Nooma K'Larr - at 2012.01.31 04:39:00
|
7. CCP, Let us moderate our own forum threads. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Hans Momaki wrote: Not sure if serious. Im quite serious. Yes, it's a double edged sword but it would make for a more civil and friendly forum environment. Corina Jarr wrote: Yeah this would allow for too much selective moderating. Th...
- by Nooma K'Larr - at 2012.01.31 04:08:00
|
8. CCP, Let us moderate our own forum threads. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Trolling would virtually stop if we could moderate our own forum threads. Give the thread creator the ability to delete questionable/offensive posts without having to involve CCP moderator intervention all the time. Some sections would be exempt,...
- by Nooma K'Larr - at 2012.01.31 01:46:00
|
9. HI-Sec, working as intended? A solution to Hi-sec illegal ganking. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Mag's wrote: Hi sec is now far safer than it's ever been and yet you still whine. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=720507#post720507 Right.
- by Nooma K'Larr - at 2012.01.30 16:21:00
|
10. Add a new forum rule... - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
One of the more contemptible replies one can give anyone here who is discussing a problem or trying to brainstorm any idea or is perceived as "whining" is to LEAVE THE GAME. Why CPP allows this I dont know. You are actually taking money out of CCP...
- by Nooma K'Larr - at 2012.01.30 16:05:00
|
11. HI-Sec, working as intended? A solution to Hi-sec illegal ganking. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
It is very telling by some of the "con" arguments in this thread how people play the game. At no point in any of those arguments does anyone mention anything about balance...just that it is always the victim's fault for getting ganked. By either b...
- by Nooma K'Larr - at 2012.01.30 15:55:00
|
12. HI-Sec, working as intended? A solution to Hi-sec illegal ganking. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Serge Bastana wrote: Sorry if the game is such a grind for you, really I am. And I'm sorry the game is so poorly unbalanced in ganker's favor. Really I am.
- by Nooma K'Larr - at 2012.01.30 01:31:00
|
13. HI-Sec, working as intended? A solution to Hi-sec illegal ganking. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Serge Bastana wrote: If you unsub over some exploded pixels, this game was never meant for you. Those exploded pixels translate into lost ISK, and lost ISK translates into lost resources and game time both in the grind and in the potential...
- by Nooma K'Larr - at 2012.01.30 01:24:00
|
14. HI-Sec, working as intended? A solution to Hi-sec illegal ganking. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Serge Bastana wrote: If you feel you matter so much, why not contact CCP directly? Keep us posted on the response. I am publicly posting on the forum aren't I? CCP does monitor the forum, right? This is not just about me, but all those t...
- by Nooma K'Larr - at 2012.01.30 01:16:00
|
15. HI-Sec, working as intended? A solution to Hi-sec illegal ganking. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Jack Carrigan wrote: Working as intended. Ganking fuels industry, which balances the economy. Next whining carebear. Ganking reduces subs. Working as intended?
- by Nooma K'Larr - at 2012.01.30 01:11:00
|
16. HI-Sec, working as intended? A solution to Hi-sec illegal ganking. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Serge Bastana wrote: It's not for the entitlement crowd, and we pay our subs as well, you aren't the only ones keeping CCP going, we've been doing it up until you came into the game and I have a strange feeling we'll keep on doing it after you...
- by Nooma K'Larr - at 2012.01.30 01:06:00
|
17. HI-Sec, working as intended? A solution to Hi-sec illegal ganking. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Andski wrote: Nooma K'Larr wrote: foxnod wrote: Nooma K'Larr wrote: If Concord gets involved then it is obviously a criminal act. So I see the differences in system sec as a robber wanting to rob a well protected bank (1.0) versus robi...
- by Nooma K'Larr - at 2012.01.30 00:56:00
|
18. HI-Sec, working as intended? A solution to Hi-sec illegal ganking. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
foxnod wrote: Nooma K'Larr wrote: If Concord gets involved then it is obviously a criminal act. So I see the differences in system sec as a robber wanting to rob a well protected bank (1.0) versus robing an abandoned house (0.5). 1. No kill...
- by Nooma K'Larr - at 2012.01.29 22:59:00
|
19. HI-Sec, working as intended? A solution to Hi-sec illegal ganking. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
If Concord gets involved then it is obviously a criminal act. So I see the differences in system sec as a robber wanting to rob a well protected bank (1.0) versus robing an abandoned house (0.5). 1. No killmail. That is a must. 2. Dropped loot i...
- by Nooma K'Larr - at 2012.01.29 20:58:00
|
20. What is the avatar above you thinking? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Torin Corax wrote: Wear goggles they said......Health and safety they said...well, if they want wonky welding ****'em I say I'm a little teapot Short and stouts Here is my handle Here is my spout When I get all steamed up I just shout Tip me...
- by Nooma K'Larr - at 2011.12.27 21:17:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |